Re : Planetary temperature
Earth Physics The Ritchie Prize
Seeking an executable understanding of the differential in a voxel
because mapping it over a sphere is rather trivial in an APL like CoSy
not "Green House Gas" spectrum is
why the bottoms of atmospheres are hotter than their tops .
But it is not in the energy balance equations .
Newton's Law of Gravity which explains how much
faster satellites go in lower orbit also explains how much
faster molecules go at the bottoms of atmospheres and thus
quantitatively explains the temperature profiles of all
planets whatever their atmosphere including the ~ 33c
warmer the bottom of our atmosphere is than our radiative
balance with the Sun .
- Particles moving "up" in a gravitational
field slow down , ie: cool ;
- Those moving down speed up , ie: heat .
The GHG paradigm , excluding the Law of Gravity in
violation even of conservation of energy , being false ,
has thus never presented a testable equation
quantifying their asserted spectral "trapping" nor an
experimental demonstration of it .
In APL ( K )
|My talk on the AlGoreWarming fraud , Fri.Mar,20190322.1800 at the WhistlingPines Gun Club
More Destructive than Stalin's Lysenkoism
lucky to be living in one of the thin peaks between ice ages . It used
to be grade school science that green life is built on CO2 and H2O
married by solar energy thru photosynthesis releasing
O2 . And we animals consume those plants and reverse the reaction for
the energy which animates us . details
For those who
classical physics , it should
become clear upon reflection that of the 2 macroscopic forces only
asymmetric centripetal GRAVITY
can "trap" heat , ie : energy , and in fact must
do so to make the equations balance . Photons themselves heat ( blue shift ) in a
gravitational well . In fact simple computations
match atmospheric temperature profiles with undeniable accuracy for all
measured planets . See recently my comments on , eg : Watts
Up With That : On #COP21 and the Madness of Crowds .
ElectroMagnetic spectral effects, constrained by the
Divergence Theorem , cannot
Al Gore & James Hansen
"Green House Gas" demonization of CO2
, the source of carbon to carbon
, gets an F in physics at a very fundamental level
. The non-quantitative "bait and switch" in Hansen et al's 1981 paper
astounded me when I read it after a tip from Ralph
Keeling . The hypothesis is that more CO2 will raise effective
altitude at which CO2 finally has an open path to radiate to space ;
It's colder higher , therefore CO2 will radiate less -- thus ( denying
the gravity is why its colder up there , and without equation ) it will trap and be responsible for the entire temperature profile below . The paper is an embarrassment to NASA .
|The Ritchie Prize
's 1833 Experiment demonstrating
absorption and emission are just two directions thru the same filter
working to establish a fund for a prize for the best "YouTube"
quantitative experimental test of any of the non-optional classical
physical computations necessary to get from the Sun's output to our
mean surface temperature .
| 20170424.1405 |
Donate to this prize . I'm starting it off
Sun.Jan,20160117 | I've made the big leagues ! DeSmogBlog
has profiled me
One of the premier climate alarmist websites has a
pretty good bio of me . My only quibble is that I was
co-author on several forgettable ( and apparently forgotten )
peer reviewed articles while in grad school .
It did give me an insight into the pal
review game .