Subject: Can We Really Cut Half of The Military Budget? You Bet! |
From: "Ron Paul" <ron.paul@campaignforliberty.com> |
Date: 2025-02-18, 06:50 |
To: Bob Armstrong <bob@cosy.com> |
![]() Bob, In the past week, not only has President Donald Trump announced he plans to swiftly end the war between Ukraine and Russia, but now Trump has suggested cutting half of the U.S. military budget. This is a monumental change in tone from past presidents. No president in decades has suggested anything like this. And as I discuss in my latest column – read it below – cutting our military budget by half is not unrealistic, protests from the war profiteers and warfare machine notwithstanding. America has the most expensive military in the world, and as such, among the most wasteful. I could write volumes about government waste. The Pentagon is probably the worst offender. We’ve been hearing about it since the Reagan years when word got out the Pentagon was paying $640 for a single plastic toilet seat. Or the Navy buying “plain round nuts” at the price of $2,043 per nut from McDonnell Douglas. Or a $285 screwdriver, a $7,622 coffee maker, a $387 flat washer, a $469 wrench, a $214 flashlight, a $437 tape measure, a $2,228 monkey wrench, a $748 pair of duckbill pliers, a $74,165 aluminum ladder, a $659 ashtray, and a $240-million airplane. Given inflation over the past 40 years, huge cost over-runs paid to the defense contractors, and the Federal Reserve printing money so the Pentagon brass can spend, spend, spend, you can only imagine what is going on today. And this doesn’t scratch the surface of the billions and billions of your tax dollars flowing overseas to fund wars and skirmishes around the world and underwriting NATO. Most Americans support a strong, adequately funded military for our defense, but when the Air Force, the branch of the military I served in, spends nearly $150,000 on soap dispensers for lavatories, we have a big problem. Read my column below, and if you support Campaign for Liberty's effort to reduce the size and cost of government as well as pursue a non-interventionist foreign policy, please support Campaign for Liberty with a contribution. For Liberty, ![]() Ron Paul ![]() Can We Really Cut Half of The Military Budget? You Bet! The wailing sound you heard last Thursday was the chorus of the Beltway warmongers shrieking in despair at President Trump’s suggestion that there was no reason for the United States to be spending one trillion dollars on “defense.” “…[O]ne of the first meetings I want to have is with President Xi of China and President Putin of Russia, and I want to say let’s cut our military budget in half. And we can do that, and I think we’ll be able to do that,” the President told reporters. With this statement, President Trump blew up one of the biggest myths of our time, particularly among Republicans, that spending more on the military is essential to keeping us safe. There is a vast and well-funded network of political and industrial interests that depend on maintaining that myth, from the weapons manufacturers to the mainstream media to the think tanks and beyond. Why? Because most of what is called “defense spending” has little to do with defending this country and a lot to do with enriching the politically well-connected. Maintaining that global military empire has bankrupted the United States while making us less safe and less free. President Trump seems to understand this. But the military-industrial complex and its cheerleaders have for decades pushed the idea that we could not survive without continuously increasing their budgets. Thanks to the work of the “Department of Government Efficiency” we are learning that much of what has been sold as “essential spending” is nothing of the sort. Take USAID, for example. We were led to believe that this agency was feeding the poor while promoting the best kind of American values overseas. Thanks to DOGE, we learned that the money was going to absurdities like funding transgender puppet shows in Peru. We are also learning that a great deal of USAID money was going to actually overthrow democratic governments overseas – as well as manipulate foreign media and promote censorship of “dissident” voices at home and abroad. Not only was USAID not helping countries overseas – it was actually harming them! Just as with USAID, when we are able to see just where that one trillion military budget is going Americans are going to fully realize that they have been lied to for decades. That is why we need a full audit of the Pentagon and full transparency of the results. We also need a change in policy. Americans are beginning to understand the economic costs of maintaining a global military empire. US taxpayers are forced to cover more than half of the entire NATO budget while European countries rattle sabers at Russia and threaten war. If Europe feels so threatened by Russia, why don’t they cover the costs of their own defense? Why do poor Americans have to pay for the defense of rich Europeans? Haven’t we had enough of this? I very much hope that President Trump follows through with his plan to drastically reduce our bloated military budget. We can start by closing the hundreds of military bases overseas, bringing back our troops from foreign countries, and eliminating our massive commitments to NATO and other international organizations. We will be richer, safer, and happier. ![]() If you’d prefer to donate via PayPal, please click here. Join Ron Paul’s Patriot Club with a monthly contribution! Your support sustains our work and members are automatically entered to receive special giveaways autographed by Ron Paul.
If you would like to make a donation by mail, please send your check to Campaign for Liberty, PO Box 104, Lake Jackson TX 77566 or you can call 703-865-7162. The mission of Campaign for Liberty is to promote and defend the great American principles of individual liberty, constitutional government, sound money, free markets, and a constitutional foreign policy, by means of education, issue advocacy, and grassroots mobilization.
Because of Campaign For Liberty's tax-exempt status under IRC Sec. 501(C)(4) and its state and federal legislative activities, contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions (IRC § 170) or as business deductions (IRC § 162(e)(1)).
|