- IBD: A new
scientific paper says that man has had little or nothing to do with global temperature variations.
Maybe the only place it’s really getting hotter is in Al Gore’s head.
- WSJ op-ed by
Pete du Pont: Waxman-Markey Deserves to Die
- Follow The
Green: “State officials who lead California’s war on global warming often travel abroad
on trips supported by the major greenhouse gas polluters they regulate…”
- Every Vote
Matters: “Senate supporters of a bill that for the first time would put limits on U.S.
greenhouse gas emissions have launched an intense one-on-one effort to sound out their
colleagues’ views in hopes of winning their support”
- Oil Sands: Not
Quite So Dirty?
- A Case Against
Precipitous Climate Action
- Could we be
wrong about global warming?
The Texas Public
Policy Foundation has a great interview with Texas State Comptroller Susan Combs, who looks at the
disastrous impact cap and trade global warming legislation would have on her states. She says Texas
is one of the top 5 states at risk for job loss.
As always, George
Will is right on the money about climate policy:
“The fixers say: On to Copenhagen! There, in December, the moveable feast of climate
confabulations will continue. By which time China, at its current pace, probably will have brought
on line 14 more coal-fired generating plants, each of them capable of providing all the electricity
needed for a city the size of San Diego. And last Sunday, India told visiting Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton that there is “no case” for U.S. pressure on India to reduce carbon
emissions.
“The costs of weaning the U.S. economy off much of its reliance on carbon are uncertain,
but certainly large. The climatic benefits of doing so are uncertain but, given the behavior of
those pesky 5 billion, almost certainly small, perhaps minuscule, even immeasurable. Fortunately,
skepticism about the evidence that supposedly supports current alarmism about climate change is
growing, as is evidence that, whatever the truth about the problem turns out to be, U.S. actions
cannot be significantly ameliorative.”
Politico had a great story last week - and a great
graphic to go with it - on the eccentric and destructive megalomania of the woman (Senator!) in
charge of reaching a climate change legislation deal in the Senate:
“During a
committee hearing in June, Boxer upbraided a brigadier general for calling her
‘Ma’am’ rather than ‘Senator.’ During another hearing this month,
Boxer found herself in a testy exchange with the CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, who
accused her of ‘condescending’ to him.
“For some
Democratic staffers, the incidents underscored the danger of having an outspoken partisan liberal in
charge of making the kinds of compromises needed to get cap and trade through the
Senate.
“‘One
of the criticisms that comes down on Boxer a great deal is that she takes it to really a very
personal level,’ said one Democratic staffer. Added another Democratic aide:
‘People don’t look at her as the person who’s going to make a deal and bring both
sides to the table. Her way is the only way.’”
Heh:
“It’s a cure for cancer… but it causes AIDS”