Edited by Patrick Gallagher
Published by Richard Vigilante
Dear Bob
Featured Story:
Good news! We have reason to believe that John McCain Watch as McCain economic adviser Steve Forbes drops all sorts of hints on Glenn Beck that
McCain's proposed cap-and-trade system, which would implement an unprecedented tax increase to combat an issue based on shaky science, is about to go
the way of the Dodo bird:
Forbes: Cap-And Trade Won't Get Very Far Under
McCain
That's right, our message is getting to him. As we said in our petition, McCain is an honorable man, and when presented with the facts about
the unsettled science surrounding climate change and the stagnating effects enacting a cap-and-trade system would have on the American economy, he'll have no choice but to make the right decision and scrap his
faulty
plan before it even gets off the ground.
Now, more than ever, it's important to keep the pressure up. Tell your friends about us. Get them to sign our petition, which you can find online.
Other Stories:
Warming Won't Drive More
Hurricanes,
Study Says
(Discovery News)
Branson's
Bogus
Eco-drive
(Irish Business News)
Calculate Nancy Pelosi's
Carbon
Footprint
(MichelleMalkin.com)
Canada
Must Prepare for New Arctic Age
(Edmonton Journal)
Great Lakes Rising Again;
Levels Close
to Normal
(Detroit Free Press)
Most Egregious Claim of the Week:
Laurie David is the ex-wife of Curb Your Enthusiasm and Seinfeld creator Larry David, and has become a self-appointed spokeswoman of sorts for the
green agenda. She has also become a fairly reliable source of outlandish claims regarding the consequences and effects of global warming.
She may have topped herself this week.
Laurie David: Global
Warming
to Blame for Daughter's Jellyfish Sting
I wish I could say I made that up, but she seems to believe it's true. I know what you're thinking: What's the big deal?
Who cares what she says about some stupid jellyfish? Why even bother bringing it up?
The problems is that this story, and countless stories like it, re-enforce the false notion that the science of global warming is settled, and the
only discussion left to have is how best to combat it. Sure, Ms. David's claims of jellyfish stings are silly and absurd, but not all such
claims are that way. Sometimes they're far worse. For example, there's Johann Hari, writing in The
Independent, a British
newspaper, who believes global warming will have far greater reprecussions than just a little redness and swelling. He compares it to a weapon
of
mass destruction kept by Al-Qaeda in a secret cave, and says that global warming:
"...doubles the intensity of hurricanes, causing them to drown a US city
and kill nearly 2,000 people. It turns Spain and Australia dry in the
worst droughts on record. It makes the oceans acidic, killing essential
parts of the food chain. It is causes these acidic seas to rise and
wash away whole nations like Bangladesh and Tuvalu. And if the machine
is left switched on for too long, it will drown London and New York and
Lagos and Kinshasa too."
These claims are utterly preposterous: Hurricanes are not made stronger by global warming, Australia has had record rainfall
in some regions this year, Bangladesh is actually gaining
land, and New York
is in no real threat of being drowned, unless Mr. Hari is confusing reality with the 2003 blockbuster, "The Day After Tomorrow."
