Subject: Re: [LPNY DISCUSS](OT) Mr. Science bad Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:37:09 -0400 To: From: Bob Armstrong On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:03:08 -0400, Blay Tarnoff wrote: >=A0Bob Armstrong wrote: >=A0> >=A0>=A0By Kepler's law . . ., if the radius of an orbit is >=A0>=A0increased by 1.1 times , the period increases by >=A0>=A01.1 ^ 3%2 =A0or about 1.1537 . > >=A0Why? As I said >=A0>=A0I have not had the product of time and interest to grok >=A0>=A0orbital energetics , but it's clearly not as simple as >=A0>=A0just saying the speed goes down as r ^ 2 . Obviously >=A0>=A0Kepler found it to be =A0r % r ^ 3%2 as I had in my table >=A0>=A0in message 19428 . In the lieu , I will just accept Tycho Brahe's observations and Kepler's curve fitting without understanding - just as Kepler did . Maybe in a couple of weeks I'll work my way up to Newton's insights . --=A0 =A0Bob Armstrong -- http://CoSy.com -- 212-285-1864 Return our Right to Relax : =A0http://ny.lp.org/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?Against_the_Smoking_Ban Liberty : http://CoSy.com/Liberty.htm =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A02003/09/30 9:31:17 AM