Subject: Re: [LPNY DISCUSS] Fabulous flying machines
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:25:22 -0400
To:        <lpny_discuss@yahoogroups.com>
From:     Bob Armstrong <bob@cosy.com>

 Gee , Gary , answering yourself now ?

 I think this is too simplistic . The competition between
 countries - with purely deadly intent until the converted
 into the sport of the Space Race of the `60s - advanced
 aircraft ( and many other technologies ) a great deal with
 survival urgency .

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 11:20:34 -0400, Gary Popkin wrote:
>=A0>From: "garypopkin" <gary_popkin@hotmail.com>
>=A0the rigidity of
>=A0>government safety regulations has constrained aircraft=
 development
>=A0>over the last fifty years so that each design complies with=
 the
>=A0>outmoded, heavy-handed regulations at each point. =A0Just think=
 of the
>=A0>kind of aircraft innovation we had in the first fifty years of=
 the
>=A0>air age, and the kind of innovation we've had in the second.
>
>=A0You and I can't even imagine the kind of fabulous flying craft=
 we would have
>=A0by now if government safety regulations hadn't been inhibiting=
 innovation
>=A0for fifty years.

--=A0
=A0Bob Armstrong -- http://CoSy.com -- 212-285-1864
Return our Right to Relax :
=A0http://ny.lp.org/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?Against_the_Smoking_Ban