Subject: Re: [LPNY DISCUSS] Re: Sean Hannity: Lost (Again) in the Twilight Zone Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 02:12:32 -0400 To: From: Bob Armstrong On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:32:21 -0000, Ronald J. Wieck wrote: > How exactly would you >=A0undertake Bush's defense? If you truly believe what you are= now >=A0saying, clearly you are committed to defending Bush's inaction= in >=A0this scenario. Any takers? What an absurd counter factual hypothetical . Pointless to= pursue . I'll attack what he is , not defend what he isn't . I'll attack that moralistic arrogant hypocritical "FREEDOM at the point of a gun" war-monger . No freedom of speech to gather money to criticise incumbents . No freedom of speech for millions of fans of Howard Stern . No habeas corpus for incommunicado prisoners of the Executive branch . No Right to bear arms for the FREED Iraqis . Curfews instead . No freedom of the press for the FREED Iraqis . What a fucking disaster . Billions of dollars and hundreds of dead Americans and thousands of dead Iraqis and thousands of wounded Americans and tens of thousands of wounded Iraqis all down a rat hole creating and spreading fear and hatred of US around the world . And the SOB is so obsessed with his family feud that while expending a couple of hundred thousand troops to further destabilize the mid-east , he can afford only 11,000 to pursue the ACTUAL criminals responsible for making the hole a thousand meters from where I sit . How the fuck do you defend that ? --=A0 =A0Bob Armstrong -- http://CoSy.com -- 212-285-1864 Libertarian Presidential Candidates =A0:= http://CoSy.com/Liberty.htm